| Central - LAL |
ne for ‘oor’. Even in the | SND | (post-1700), there are 18 for | 2022 |
| Central - WCE |
Scottish National Dictionary ( | SND | ), tho monie ither achievement | 2012 |
| Central - LAL |
Scottish National Dictionary ( | SND | ) wis dark, derk or dairk. Tak | 2012 |
| Central - LAL |
rallel in wark. According tae | SND | , derk appears, at least until | 2012 |
| Central - LAL |
d vyrk. Nae consensus ava. In | SND | , wark seems tae hae the gree | 2012 |
| Central - LAL |
lairn oor language’. In the | SND | , ‘lairn’ is a variant o t | 2022 |
| Central - SEC |
the acual orthography in the | SND | . | 2003 |
| Ulster - GUL | Scots Dictionaries ana: CSD, | SND | ... | 2015 |
| Central - SEC |
uid tae see it set oot in the | SND | . Follaein on fae this, mair r | 2003 |
| Central - SEC |
bi the uphauders o the RWS an | SND | /SSD is that they try an pit f | 2003 |
| Central - SEC |
me that's no lippenin tae the | SND | /SSD or the RWS, the current t | 2003 |
| Central - SEC |
pelled, A leuks for it in the | SND | an checks the phonetics o the | 2003 |
| Central - LAL |
er’ gies 231 results in the | SND | and 169 in the DOST – and t | 2022 |
| Central - LAL |
for surroond (full text, both | SND | and DOST) – No results were | 2022 |
| Central - LAL |
h for memmer (full text, both | SND | and DOST) – No results were | 2022 |
| Central - LAL |
s etymologies no juist in the | SND | an DOST but in the Oxford Eng | 2012 |
| Central - LAL |
Ah mentioned aboot digitisin | SND | an the problems we wir haein | 2001 |
| Central - SEC |
fter editor o the DOST an the | SND | chauvit awa tae fetch oot a h | 2004 |
| Central - LAL |
dictionar itsel asweel's the | SND | frae nineteen fiftie twae an | 2001 |
| Central - SEC |
should be sayed tho, that the | SND | is the maist important resour | 2003 |
| Central - SEC |
an A can say that naither the | SND | nor the RWS nor the Report o | 2003 |
| Central - SEC |
is the trouble wi the RWS an | SND | no takkin intae accoont the c | 2003 |
| Central - SEC |
ot than aither the Victorian, | SND | or RWS spellins. Bi "better t | 2003 |
| Central - SEC |
in in the SSD, an naither the | SND | or the SSD can be taen as def | 2003 |
| Central - SEC |
be written 'fir'?" The RWS an | SND | solves (but disna sort) aa th | 2003 |
| Central - SEC |
e raesons for lattin abee the | SND | spellins an the RWS: thir's b | 2003 |