| Central - LAL |
twa-three thochts for an anti- | latinate | manifesto: |
| Central - LAL |
ise amang the purist (or anti- | latinate | ) camp is plain. In baith kint |
| Central - LAL |
creivers i the borraein (i.e. | latinate | ) camp seems tae hae seen the |
| Central - LAL |
gle hamelt wird tae replace a | latinate | ane – that’s forwhy the l |
| Central - LAL |
ce o the vernacular, atween a | Latinate | an a ‘plain’ style. |
| Central - EDN |
eady notit abuin. And whaur a | Latinate | wird leuks tae hiv entert Sco |
| Central - LAL |
forbye. They aften introduced | latinate | vocabular athout the warrant |
| Central - LAL |
everyday athoot needin tae be | latinate | . Mony items – an hale areas |
| Central - LAL |
ten taiglin a wee ahint). The | latinate | element, an the registers wha |
| Central - LAL |
aw as if naiturally intae the | latinate | tendency. Its creitics in Eng |
| Central - LAL |
Scots writers didnae tak the | latinate | style tae the lengths at some |
| Central - LAL |
oquent in their praises o the | latinate | style o Lydgate an Chaucer, a |
| Central - LAL |
ecurrent deifficulties is the | latinate | vocabular we fin oorsels uisi |
| Central - EDN |
endent states? Or aiblins the | Latinate | lexis wis aaready pairt o (No |
| Central - LAL |
ane – that’s forwhy the | latinate | vocabular was borraed i the f |
| Central - EDN |
le body of distinctive formal | Latinate | diction which [Scots] did not |
| Central - EDN |
art me consíder the naitur o | Latinate | (or ‘Romance’) lendwirds |
| Central - LAL |
The mair | Latinate | , the mair liker Inglis |
| Central - LAL |
sed terminology. Maist o this | latinate | vocabular is the same in Scot |
| Central - LAL |
style – ane at is | latinate | whaurever necessar raither no |
| Central - LAL |
camps, bit simply tae a less | latinate | style – ane at is latinate |
| Central - EDN |
the table is the puckle Scots | Latinate | wirds that’s still in uiss |
| Central - LAL |
canna expeck to get rid o aw | latinate | terms frae oor screivin. Bit |